Reform needs a reality check I can’t imagine being Keir Starmer at the moment. You’d imagine, with 403 MPs, that it was easier than ever to be Prime Minister: with that many backbenchers, bills amount to decrees. Reality begs to differ. Having promised not to raise taxes on working people, the nearest available method to filling the “black hole” — cutting spending — has been scuppered too. A revolt by Labour backbenchers has gutted his ministry’s attempt to reform welfare spending. In the most recent edition of Prime Ministers’ Questions, following this U-turn, he failed to confirm that Rachel Reeves would keep her job, leaving the Chancellor in tears. Ordinarily, a series of Labour faults of this sort would put the ball firmly in the Tory court. In the 70s, “Labour isn’t working” meant “Vote Conservative” — the implication was obvious. However, the trends of the past twelve months suggest that Reform has been best positioned to capitalise on Labour failures. National popular vote poll...
Everyone, even centrist-in-chief Rory Stewart, agrees that Britain needs reform. Crime, violent and petty, goes unpunished. Economic growth has flatlined since the Great Financial Crisis. Britons, especially young ones, are ashamed of their country. There lies the fundamental appeal of the Reform campaign: the current way, however articulated, isn't working and so the country needs something radically different. The party catapulted itself to the third most popular in Britain at the summer's General Election with a bold promise to break the two-party duopoly, reduce net migration to zero from its sky-high startpoint, and simultaneously cut taxes for everyone while reducing the budget. First Past the Post's tendency to protect established players prevented Reform from winning more than five seats outright. Nonetheless, the party's millions of votes nationwide made it a kingmaker in numerous constituencies and inaugurated a new era in British politics. The Labour Party...